From the monthly archives:

December 2004

Firefox go-faster tip for broadband

by shahid on December 31, 2004

If you’re on a broadband connection, this tip makes Firefox faster.

1.Type “about:config” into the address bar and hit return. Scroll down and look for the following entries:

network.http.pipelining network.http.proxy.pipelining network.http.pipelining.maxrequests

Normally the browser will make one request to a web page at a time. When you enable pipelining it will make several at once, which really speeds up page loading.

2. Alter the entries as follows:

Set “network.http.pipelining” to “true”

Set “network.http.proxy.pipelining” to “true”

Set “network.http.pipelining.maxrequests” to some number like 30. This means it will make 30 requests at once.

3. Lastly right-click anywhere and select New-> Integer. Name it “nglayout.initialpaint.delay” and set its value to “0″. This value is the amount of time the browser waits before it acts on information it receives.

{ 0 comments }

Make up your mind woman!!

by shahid on December 30, 2004

With the standard qualifier that all men now have to attach to anything they say - “I’m not a mysognist” - I’d like to say a few thngs about how fathers are marginalised when families break down. Again.

Men are constantly reminded to be more involved in the lives of their children. From the new-fangled-new-man cutting the umbilical cord and gorging on placenta fried with some garlic, served with fava beads and a Chianti, to taking time off high-pressure jobs where they’re soul-raped on a daily basis, to attend a school production on which is attached preposterous importance by the mother who is fed by the society that has taken such pains to emasculate and de-man men.

Involvement is not meant to be theatrical, under peer-pressure. “Oh, but think of the emotional impact it will have on the child if you don’t attend!” Erm, did you read that in the same book where you learned how to emotionally roger children on a daily basis? Or the coffee group where you reinforce the man-hate-ethic while your men get hated by more men at work? Bitter? Me? Naah! OK, there are some brilliant, hard-working mums. But nobody ever talks about the brilliant, hard-working dads. Despite the so-called sexual revolution, that’s still expected, no, demanded of men! Without complaint. Without mention. Without any kind of emotional remuneration.

Involvement is what happens when no one but you and your children are there. Involvement is fairness no matter what. It is grace under pressure. Involvement is reining in anger and never allowing emotion to over-ride your tongue when your children are doing their best to unseat your composure.

But hey, paternity leave is still not equal to maternity leave. When there’s a separation, the mother gets the counselling. The state de facto assumes that the mother is the better parent. In family therapy, the father is excluded. Why should he be included? He’s just the fucking father. He couldn’t possibly give a shit about his children!

The courts rule in favour of the mother, regardless of circumstances. Schools don’t contact both parents about children’s activities, only the mother gets contacted. So when the father doesn’t turn up at events, despite his sincerest wishes to participate, he gets made to look the foolish, errant dad. The mums know this and discuss it at lengths at their man-bashing coffee mornings. All men are bastards, and of course, some women go all out to make it so, to prove it so, to repeat the circle. No, I’m not cynical, really I’m not.

Equality? Don’t make me laugh.

(Image courtesy of Garry Clarkson, official photographer for Fathers-4-Justice - Thanks Garry - all your rights in this image are reserved by you and many thanks for letting me use it - and for your kind words about my posts)

{ 0 comments }

The Value of Human Life

by shahid on December 30, 2004

It seems very difficult for most people, myself included, to connect with the scale of the tragedy in south-east Asia. When 10 people die in a rail crash in the West, it’s called a tragedy. Of course, any loss of human life through accident or “Act of God” is tragic. It’s sad. The problem of language is that it there is not the adjective that would escalate the word “tragedy” into anything that could encompass the sheer scale of human loss.

When a person dies, it’s a tragedy. When a hundred thousand die, it’s a statistic.

To put it into some kind of perspective, the A-bomb dropped on Hiroshima killed about the same number of people as the earthquake off Indonesia.

I don’t have the words myself. Where words fail, pictures convey. Have a look at the following satellite images of the coast of Sri Lanka before and after the tsunami hit.

{ 1 comment }

Spy where?

by shahid on December 30, 2004

Do you hate spyware? I know I do. I have far fewer problems on the Mac, but use a PC from time to time, like when my hard drive dies…ho hum… At such times, I use Firefox. Many of you already use it, indeed, I was alerted to it by my good friend Geoff, who actually alerts me to just about anything of any value on a PC.

Firefox is much more spyware-resistant than IE. I won’t point out the tools, but if you really want to know, I’m sure Geoff can point to some cool links for you to help remove the scum from your machine.

I also like Firefox because it offers tabbed browsing without resorting to plug-ins. And if you like extensibility, Firefox again delivers the goods.

If you read newsfeeds or blogs through RSS, then Firefox gives you an RSS reader built right into the browser.

Enough advertising. Try it out. It’s not perfect, I’m sure there are still some things that IE does better, but I wouldn’t use IE on the PC anymore unless I had a gun to my head.

A reader wrote in to tell me that he couldn’t read my archives with Firefox because it didn’t interpret the HTML content of the text file format that archives are stored in, but apparently, he reports this has now been fxed.

Of course, I use a Mac, which has Safari pre-installed. The only thing I miss is the warning dialogue that Firefox gives when you attempt to close a window with multiple tabs in it.

{ 0 comments }

Merry Christmas!

by shahid on December 25, 2004

Merry Christmas to all my readers.

Remember, charity, goodwill and giving are for life, not just for Christmas!

All the best!

{ 0 comments }

Fathers4Justice

by shahid on December 23, 2004


I am very grateful to the group Fathers4Justice for raising the profile of fathers who want to spend more time with their kids. The counter-argument raised by some of the women these men have become estranged from is interesting. They remark that if the fathers spent less time campaigning and more time actually trying to make contact with their children, they might get what they want. Now I don’t know what the personal situation is of each of those broken families, but they make me laugh when I think about my own situation and the devious arguments used by my ex.

Many women go on about what a strain it is to bring up kids single-handedly. Well, give me that strain anyday! I can’t think of a greater privilege than to be in the lives of my children, and to raise them and give them values and feed them and clothe them and educate them and love them and nurture them and guide them. I love every minute with my children and would gladly be with them 24/7. Do I know how hard that is? Yes. I would rather be with my kids than without. Nobody has children to have an easy life. Life isn’t meant to be easy. If it is, then you’re not doing things right. So don’t complain about having to bring children up. Bringing them up is a privilege. An honour. A delight.

There are so many emotional issues here, that it’s all too easy to lose track of what’s really important here. The kids. Now I’m moving away from the whole Western ideal of kid worship. This is often raised by those without kids or those with so much money that they are immune from any side effect of inefficient and damaging child-rearing. Yes, children should be loved. Yes, children should be educated. Yes, children should be protected from abuse. But they should not be protected from discipline or from the consequeneces of their own behaviour. Otherwise you end up with a society as shit as the one we have today, where people walking down my perfectly respectable street think it’s fine to urinate in my neighbour’s bushes, their genitalia on full, public, drunken display. Where people on a perfectly respectable street think it’s ok to play music, loud enough to rattle your furniture, at 3, 4 and 5 of the a.m. Where kids think it’s ok to carry knives and kill their fellow pupils over an imaginary girlfriend dispute. It could be worse. But let’s not go there just now.

I don’t believe in physically chastising children, and I don’t believe in oppressing or belittling children. God knows they’re little enough already. But if my kid does something wrong, I will tell them. I won’t protect them from the consequences of their bad behaviour, but I will protect them from any over-the-top retribution. It’s a fine balance.

Of course, my ex might agree with all of the above. I know she agreed when we talked about it before we were married. She might even scream it from the rooftops. And many would even believe her. But I know better. To proclaim something loudly and hold it as your belief, and to practice the opposite, even when boldly confronted with the evidence of the errant behaviour, is called hypocrisy.

I didn’t lightly entertain the notion of walking out on my kids. In fact, I thought about it for years. I had even made the decision in 1999 that I would go when B2, my younger one, was 6 and no sooner. Why? Because studies show that although the effects of any marital breakdown presents trauma to children, it is far more damaging when done before the age of 6 when the psychological profile of a child is still in development. I can testify to this from my own experience. I was affected by the break-up of my parents, as was my sister. But we knew how and why, to differing extents. My brother was affected too, but he was too young to know how or why. To his infinite credit, my brother has recovered magnificently from the depths of Hell to emerge a wonderful (if slightly profane) adult with a great family.

So I didn’t leave lightly. Yesterday, I talked to my ex about keeping the girls for a week over Christmas. This was something she had agreed to before the holidays. Yesterday however, all that went out of the window when she point blank refused, before taking them away on holiday for a week. And here’s the thing that I will always face: her defence of walking roughshod over the children’s wishes (they have pleaded with me many times to stay longer than a few days, that they wish they could spend more time with me) was simple. “You chose to leave.” The inference was clear, and she attempted to shed light on it through her continuing rant - I chose to leave, therefore I have no rights. She said I wasn’t a good role model. To which I countered very well, but to no avail. She is like the thief who when the theft becomes apparent, shouts “Thief! Thief!” and runs off in the confusion.

I told her that the kids wanted to spend more time with me, and that since she had them all the time, and since she was happy with the Statement of Arrangements for Children that stipulated shared holiday time, there should be no issue. She gave another feeble excuse - that she wanted to take them for Juma prayer. (Juma is the Friday congregational prayer for Muslims). I countered that since neither she nor the children observe the obilgatory salaat (the 5 daily prayers of Muslims that form a pillar of Islam), that once again, her priorities were wrong. Never mind the fact that she wouldn’t be taking them for Juma this Friday since she’d be away for a Christmas holiday without having consulted me about it. Never mind the fact that Juma is not compulsory for women, it is preferably, but salaat comes first. She likes to show her face at Juma because she is a socialite and wants people to believe that she is a believer. I am determined that this hypocrisy doesn’t infect my children, that they see that charity and virtuous acts are things you don’t brag about, but it’s not easy.

If it were me on Buckingham Palace in a Batman costume, she would gladly tell reporters that I didn’t even want to see my children on my birthday, so what kind of a father am I? She would conveniently ignore numerous important points. Like the fact that she has hijacked my birthday and fathers days for years, by deliberately throwing a strop and upsetting the children and me on these days. She would counter with the three birthdays in which she has arranged surprises for me. I would counter with the jealous fits she threw after each of them. Rendering them pretty meaningless. She would forget that on this birthday, despite our agreement that the day would be kept free so that I could see the children, she had arranged something weeks before for the day which meant I wouldn’t be able to see them, but she would continue to say that she had kept the day free. I didn’t hear from my kids until I gave in and called at just before 3 in the afternoon. I had to unfortunately hear her voice and her bickering, which was upsetting the children. They know what she does, and it upsets them, but they are her kids and they won’t take sides against either of us. Why should they? So eventually, I gave in, because fathers always do and went to see them for all of 45 minutes.

My ex’s parents always said that my life was in the hearts of my children, and that their lives were in my heart. This is confirmed from repeated observation, from all my interactions with my children and every action I have ever taken in regards to their upbringing. I am not good at propoganda and lies, it takes energy and wit that I simply do not have. It is far easier to tell the truth. Over the last year and a half, I’ve learned a little more of politics, but it’s not enough.

I am not bad for my children. On the one hand, in family therapy sessions, their mother says that I could spend more time with them, but don’t, I’m obviously spending it with another woman, and on the other hand, I make myself available at a moment’s notice, every day, and I’m pulled and pushed like Dirty Harry running from phone booth to phone booth at the behest of Scorpio. (Mehnaz is a Scorpio too, come to think of it!). My access is messed up and hijacked all the time. My times of access are altered from day to day. When the girls are with me, all too briefly, their mother calls them many times a day and is overly fawning, telling them after an hour of them being with me that she misses them terribly, messing up their minds, not allowing them to feel anything other than guilt for betraying their mother by seeing their father. Of course, she saves the swearing, belittling, shouting and beating for when they get home.

I have made every effort to be flexible, accommodating and forgiving. I knew I’d get fucked, which is why I’ve kept a private diary of dates, times, promises and incidents. None of that matters while the minds of my children are messed up and their mother gets to propogate lies and filth for 18 months while I’m told to keep my mouth shut and my dignity intact. While I do all that, my children are up shit creek. I’m told to play the long game. That’s what I’ve done. It’s beginning to bear fruit. But not nearly enough. There’s nothing I can do to take away the pain I caused my children, but I made the decision that a father who is alive would be more use to them than a dead one. And staying in that marriage would have killed me. I could start talking about what she had done, to get my side across, but it wouldn’t help my kids. It would just make me feel better. And when people began to find out what she’d done and how she’d been that drove me to leave, it would make her life hell. And in turn, that would make things worse for my kids. So I really can’t win. I have to make the best of a bad situation and hope that my children aren’t too damaged in the interim.

Now: My only question is, which superhero am I?

{ 3 comments }

Let’s Get Together!

by shahid on December 21, 2004

I used to work with James Sheahan at Hasbro. He was talented and under-used. Always calm, unruffled, good natured and helpful. Nobody ever had a bad word to say about him and he was popular and charming to boot. Bastard!

Today, a good friend of mine, outrageously talented and exceptionally good with members of the opposite sex, and the victim of envy, and in some cases, lust, of the same sex, Kevin Mullard, showed me what James is up to nowadays.

It’s a wonderful idea, and like many wonderful ideas, one wonders why this wonderful idea hasn’t been wondered about before. It probably has, but James seems to have pulled it off.

You know how it’s such a pain to get together with people nowadays? James has a great hi-tech solution.

Please visit his site When Then? and let me know what you think. If you join, please let James know I sent you. And no, I’m not on commission. That would be bad for my independence. James is asking practically bugger all for the service anyway. Enough - go see for yourself!

{ 0 comments }

My birthday present

by shahid on December 21, 2004

If anyone really rich is reading this, I want a 20″ G5 iMac for my birthday. OK? And while you’re at it, do ensure that the RAM is upgraded to a full gigabyte. Ta. There’s an Apple shop in Regent Street. Delivery to my place any time this week would be much appreciated.

{ 2 comments }

Calmer Suitor

by shahid on December 21, 2004

I’ve been following with some amusement the enormous fuss in India over a video snippet created with the aid of a mobile phone. Somehow, this snippet was posted on Bazee, the Indian version of eBay and caught the attention of a number of authorities. The Americanised Indian who heads that organisation has been jailed; he is sleeping on the floor of a cell which he shares with 70 hardcore criminals intent on defiling his anal integrity. It’s a bit like the German head of AOL who a while ago was jailed because some moron was posting anti-semitic material somewhere on an AOL-hosted website.

The fuss has reached the Indian parliament and has even attracted the ire of the arch-bitch-of-the-universe Condom-Lisa Rice. She should know better than to stick her filthy snout into the affairs of another democratic nation. Stick to raping Iraq you loathsome whore of Babylon. (Sorry, got a little side-tracked there!)

The point is, all this over a schoolboy of 17, who captured for digital posterity, the act of his girfriend, 16 going down on him. Naturally, both pupils have been expelled from their prestigious Delhi school over the furore.

What pissed me off was not the fuss and the attention - it was the nagging question in the back of my head - “Was I the only 17 year old not getting blown??”

Never mind 17!!! The years rolled on, and on, and on…

{ 0 comments }

Cheque Out

by shahid on December 21, 2004


Friday before last I deposited a cheque into my basic, no-frills, we-give-you-Solo-coz-you’re-a-credit-free-zone account. It was for a piffling amount. It shouldn’t matter. It cleared today. TODAY. It went in on the 11th and it’s now the 21st. Two weekends in there, but don’t tell me computers can’t work weekends?

What gives? And why does the money clear my account the same minute when I draw from a cash machine? Why doesn’t that take 10 days? How do the banks get away with it?

These are the same fuckers who didn’t process a giro in time, missing a direct debit instated at great insistence by BT to “save me money” by a single day. The bill was for £50. The charge levied by the bank, because my giro was processed by them a day late was for £35. The giro went in the next day to cover the amount, but of course, by that time, the bank had raped me. Do they have any idea how much £35 means to me? Vile, thieving, penny-pinching scum. May they all rot in hell.

{ 0 comments }