“Jewish Hypocrisy”

If the headline above, were to appear in the BBC, or any other mainstream media outlet; if such slurs were repeated over and over, week in, week out, month in, month out, would such ill-informed hatred not be considered a vendetta against Jews? Would it be acceptable? Would there not be an outcry?

It appears that it is acceptable to refer to Muslims as a monolithic entity, and to villify them continuously. Will people not wake up and see that this is wrong? Would such a campaign of ridicule and hatred be acceptable against blacks?

Hell, they’re dragging out apostate pakis like The Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali to shoot across the bows of the whole of Islam. What a prick, and the BBC again, subscribing to evil villification, racism, demonisation and hatred. What a shame they didn’t make a big deal of the white terrorists eh? But why let a good propaganda campaign spoil the fun?

Most of you can’t see it, because you’re not affected by it. Take your brown-tinted glasses off for a second, the world is not as it appears…

Now, for the ladies reading, and those who are sensitive, time to look away, as I am about to embark on a campaign of profanity that would make Irvine Welsh blush.

Mr Nazir-Ali argued it would never be possible to satisfy all of the demands made by Muslims because “their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when Muslims are victims… and always wrong when Muslims are the oppressors or terrorists”.

You see, here the stupid cunt goes again. You who don’t see, think this is quite normal because you’re neck deep in blind hatred yourself. You are brainwashed. And when I tell you that (look, it isn’t all of you, but it’s more of you than you think) – you get offended. But you need to stop calling Muslims terrorists and you need to shut the fuck up and listen to some reason if you want solutions to the government/media sponsored fear that saps your lives and fills you with dread and hatred.

Let me explain, the ABC of hatred and demonisation, from the paragraph I’ve just quoted. We’ll take it really slow….

it would never be possible to satisfy all of the demands made by Muslims

I will illustrate how moronic, stupid and dangerous this propaganda is, whether it comes from the Times’ writer, the BBC web editor, or that opportunistic-apostate-paki-cunt himself.

Replace the word “Muslims” with “Jews” or “blacks”
• Has he asked all Muslims what they think?
• Does he know all demands of Muslims?
• If he did, would he realise that many of those demands are contradictory?
• Do we understand that Muslims are not a faceless block? We are all individuals, with a myriad of experiences and ideas and dreams and hopes and fears. Yes, like the fucking rest of you. That’s right – the lessons of racism should make this clear – we are more alike than we are different.
• “Never” is a strong word to use in a stupid sentence.

But basically, what the bishop is telling you – and you are buying this shit (unless you’re one of my enlightened readers, and there are many of you I know, is that Muslims have a single mind. That we are impossible to satisfy. That we ask for the impossible. That we are asking for more than what anybody else asks for. It is racist, it is hateful and it is insulting.

I am a Muslim. Muammar Gadafi is a Muslim. Osama bin Laden is a Muslim. Shazia Mirza is a Muslim. Imran Khan is a Muslim. And we are all so unbelievably different and we all have different views and we are not fucking interchangeable!. We are human beings, like you, and you need to stop buying this racist crap that divides us. Some of us go to mosque, some of us don’t. Some of us think the niqab is compulsory, others wear nothing over their heads at all. Some of us pray regularly, some of us don’t. We are all so unique. WE ARE ALL SO UNIQUE. WE ARE NOT BORG!!

As I demonstrated earlier, Asians are better integrated than people think – and whites are less integrated, less likely to make friends (come on – try being hospitable, or are you too good for us?) and less trusting and suspicious than we are. Doesn’t sound right, does it? It’s true though, and the newspapers and web sites that print shit have already forgotten to tell you loudly, that the liquid restrictions have been lifted at airports, because actually, we all know it’s totally fucking impossible to assemble a liquid bomb in anything less than perfect lab conditions, or you will blow yourself up….in the meantime, the purpose of the government was served, though it seems more and more of us, thankfully, mercifully, are now seeing through the government’s stupid little charades designed to divide and frighten us.

Now that you (hopefully) understand that Islam is comprised of all kinds of people, as are Jews, Christians and others with little or no faith at all, I will continue to dissect the propaganda from a single paragraph.

because “their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when Muslims are victims… and always wrong when Muslims are the oppressors or terrorists”.

Remember, the opportunistic-turncoat-judas-apostate-paki has started by making the assumption that all Muslims are the same. (Here’s a reminder. All niggers are the same. All yids are the same. All pakis are the same. All Americans are the same. Doesn’t sound right, does it? It’s because your experience proves such racist short-cuts to be irredeemably false). And now Nazir Ali (a lot easier to type – never thought you’d hear that about a paki name, did you?) tells us what our complaint often boils down to. So let’s look at that, shall we?

“Always right to intervene when Muslims are the victims”.
Victims of what? Zionaxis slaughter? We are already intervening in that. We are already killing as many Muslims as we possibly can. It would be harder for the countries of the Zionaxis (America, Britain, Israel, Australia etc.) to intervene any more brutally than we already are. What a nonsensical pile of shit.
“Never right to intervene when Muslims are the attackers”
Again, what the hell is he saying? Christians are committing evil. Jews are committing evil. Atheists are committing evil. Do we call them up on their religion? Do these people not see that generalising to religion is based on centuries-old demonisation of Islam by Crusaders and Orientalists – all of which has been rebutted and discredited?

Start with a generalisation, finish with a generalisation, be racist, be opportunistic, stir up the hatred and fuck off. Nice one.

Oh and by the way, if any Jew were to come out with stuff like the above about Zionists in Israel (who are some of the most wretched and evil, child-murdering cunts in the world), there would be a worldwide political and media shitstorm calling him a “self-hater”. Whereas this cunt has half the heads in middle England nodding sagely. “Oh yes, those Muslims have chips on their shoulders, we never seem to be able to do right by them”.

I am a Muslim. I will tell you what I think, because I will not let this apostate-judas-self-hater-prick talk for me on an international platform, with such ignorance and hatred.

If a person does wrong, there should be justice. No matter who or what they are. If a person is oppressed by tyranny, that person should be helped, no matter who or what they are.

And the beauty of humanity is that somebody else will have a completely different view. Unfortunately, that is also the ugliness of humanity.